Conceptualizing Learning Evaluation in Elementary Education: An Integrative Review of Evaluation Objects, Evaluators, and Functions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46870/passikola.v3i1.1909Keywords:
Learning Evaluation, Evaluation Objects, Evaluation Subjects, Elementary Education, Authentic AssessmentAbstract
This study aimed to analyze and synthesize conceptualizations of the objects and subjects/evaluators of learning evaluation in elementary education and to identify the relationships among evaluation objects, evaluators, evaluation functions, and the use of evaluation results. An integrative literature review was conducted on publications issued between 2015 and 2025. Searches of Google Scholar, Scopus, and ERIC, conducted from 10 to 15 January 2026, identified 452 records; following duplicate removal and screening, 26 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final thematic synthesis. Five themes emerged: an emphasis on student achievement (17/26; 65.4%), limited use of evaluation for instructional reflection (14/26; 53.8%), underrepresentation of affective and psychomotor dimensions (13/26; 50.0%), movement toward authentic and participatory evaluation (11/26; 42.3%), and ambiguity among evaluators, evaluatees, and objects of evaluation (9/26; 34.6%). The findings indicate that the reviewed literature, rather than the present study directly assessing teachers, more frequently portrays evaluation as oriented toward student outcomes than toward reflective and instructional-improvement functions. Conceptually, the synthesis highlights the need to distinguish the evaluator as the actor conducting the evaluation, the evaluatee as the individual or unit being evaluated, the object of evaluation as the aspect being assessed, and the evaluation function as encompassing judgment, feedback, reflection, and decision-making. The findings also suggest an emerging movement toward authentic and participatory evaluation, although this orientation was not dominant across the corpus. The review is limited by its coverage of three databases, the inclusion of only Indonesian- and English-language publications, and terminological heterogeneity across sources; therefore, future studies should empirically validate the proposed framework through teacher interviews, classroom observations, or surveys.
References
Ahmadi, A. M., Raihan, D., Alawiyah, H., Martines, M., & Kistian, A. (2025). Problematika guru dalam melaksanakan evaluasi pembelajaran siswa di kelas IV sekolah dasar. Jurnal Binagogik, 12(1), 33–40. https://ejournal.uncm.ac.id/index.php/pgsd/article/view/1519
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Ansya, Y. A. U., Alfianita, A., Syahkira, H. P., & Syahrial, S. (2024). Peran evaluasi pembelajaran pada mata pelajaran matematika kelas V sekolah dasar. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v6i2.15030
Ardana, L. N., Vega, N., Kirana, P., & Sunaryati, T. (2023). Peran penting evaluasi pembelajaran pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di sekolah dasar berbasis pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 15814–15819. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.8871
Arikunto, S. (2008). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Cet. ke-8). Bumi Aksara.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251–272. 10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. 10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Fernanda, S. A., Fernica, V. O., & Pratama, M. B. (2025). Penerapan evaluasi autentik dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila di tingkat sekolah dasar. Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(5), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i5.277
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
Mutiara, A., Subayu, D., Pratama, M. R., Syahputri, N., Handayani, P., Lestari, R., & Panggabean, H. S. (2025). Objek evaluasi pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 5(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v5i1.1901
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nuriyah, N. (2016). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Sebuah kajian teori. Edueksos: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/edueksos.v3i1.327
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Saputra, A. (2025). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi. Ar-Raudah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keagamaan, 2(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61891/ar-raudah.v2i4.651
Septiani, A. N., Pratiwi, D., & Rossy, R. (2023). Evaluasi pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan mutu pendidikan di sekolah dasar. MASALIQ, 3(5), 824–832. 10.58578/masaliq.v3i5.1380
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sudrajat, H. (2018). Analisis alat evaluasi pada mata pelajaran IPA di kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri 3 Nyerot Kecamatan Jonggat Lombok Tengah Nusa Tenggara Barat [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim].
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Usri, U., Salam, A. M. I., Hasanuddin, M. I., & Badaruddin, S. (2025). Bridging Expectations and Outcomes: A Discrepancy Model Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness in an Islamic Higher Education Context. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 2058-2069. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7544
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Yao, Y., Amos, M., Snider, K., & Brown, T. (2024). The impact of formative assessment on K–12 learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 29(7–8), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2363831
Zainudin, Z., & Ubabuddin, U. (2023). Ranah kognitif, afektif dan psikomotorik sebagai objek evaluasi hasil belajar peserta didik. ILJ: Islamic Learning Journal, 1(3), 915–931. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.11169
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Passikola: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar & Madrasah Ibtidaiyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





