Conceptualizing Learning Evaluation in Elementary Education: An Integrative Review of Evaluation Objects, Evaluators, and Functions

Authors

  • Khodijah UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin
  • Eva Rizkiya Safitri Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin
  • Ruby Tri Maharani Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46870/passikola.v3i1.1909

Keywords:

Learning Evaluation, Evaluation Objects, Evaluation Subjects, Elementary Education, Authentic Assessment

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and synthesize conceptualizations of the objects and subjects/evaluators of learning evaluation in elementary education and to identify the relationships among evaluation objects, evaluators, evaluation functions, and the use of evaluation results. An integrative literature review was conducted on publications issued between 2015 and 2025. Searches of Google Scholar, Scopus, and ERIC, conducted from 10 to 15 January 2026, identified 452 records; following duplicate removal and screening, 26 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final thematic synthesis. Five themes emerged: an emphasis on student achievement (17/26; 65.4%), limited use of evaluation for instructional reflection (14/26; 53.8%), underrepresentation of affective and psychomotor dimensions (13/26; 50.0%), movement toward authentic and participatory evaluation (11/26; 42.3%), and ambiguity among evaluators, evaluatees, and objects of evaluation (9/26; 34.6%). The findings indicate that the reviewed literature, rather than the present study directly assessing teachers, more frequently portrays evaluation as oriented toward student outcomes than toward reflective and instructional-improvement functions. Conceptually, the synthesis highlights the need to distinguish the evaluator as the actor conducting the evaluation, the evaluatee as the individual or unit being evaluated, the object of evaluation as the aspect being assessed, and the evaluation function as encompassing judgment, feedback, reflection, and decision-making. The findings also suggest an emerging movement toward authentic and participatory evaluation, although this orientation was not dominant across the corpus. The review is limited by its coverage of three databases, the inclusion of only Indonesian- and English-language publications, and terminological heterogeneity across sources; therefore, future studies should empirically validate the proposed framework through teacher interviews, classroom observations, or surveys.

References

Ahmadi, A. M., Raihan, D., Alawiyah, H., Martines, M., & Kistian, A. (2025). Problematika guru dalam melaksanakan evaluasi pembelajaran siswa di kelas IV sekolah dasar. Jurnal Binagogik, 12(1), 33–40. https://ejournal.uncm.ac.id/index.php/pgsd/article/view/1519

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087

Ansya, Y. A. U., Alfianita, A., Syahkira, H. P., & Syahrial, S. (2024). Peran evaluasi pembelajaran pada mata pelajaran matematika kelas V sekolah dasar. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v6i2.15030

Ardana, L. N., Vega, N., Kirana, P., & Sunaryati, T. (2023). Peran penting evaluasi pembelajaran pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di sekolah dasar berbasis pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 15814–15819. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.8871

Arikunto, S. (2008). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Cet. ke-8). Bumi Aksara.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251–272. 10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6

Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. 10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3

Fernanda, S. A., Fernica, V. O., & Pratama, M. B. (2025). Penerapan evaluasi autentik dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila di tingkat sekolah dasar. Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(5), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i5.277

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Mutiara, A., Subayu, D., Pratama, M. R., Syahputri, N., Handayani, P., Lestari, R., & Panggabean, H. S. (2025). Objek evaluasi pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 5(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v5i1.1901

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Nuriyah, N. (2016). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Sebuah kajian teori. Edueksos: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/edueksos.v3i1.327

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004

Saputra, A. (2025). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi. Ar-Raudah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keagamaan, 2(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61891/ar-raudah.v2i4.651

Septiani, A. N., Pratiwi, D., & Rossy, R. (2023). Evaluasi pembelajaran dalam meningkatkan mutu pendidikan di sekolah dasar. MASALIQ, 3(5), 824–832. 10.58578/masaliq.v3i5.1380

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sudrajat, H. (2018). Analisis alat evaluasi pada mata pelajaran IPA di kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri 3 Nyerot Kecamatan Jonggat Lombok Tengah Nusa Tenggara Barat [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim].

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Usri, U., Salam, A. M. I., Hasanuddin, M. I., & Badaruddin, S. (2025). Bridging Expectations and Outcomes: A Discrepancy Model Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness in an Islamic Higher Education Context. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 2058-2069. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7544

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010

Yao, Y., Amos, M., Snider, K., & Brown, T. (2024). The impact of formative assessment on K–12 learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 29(7–8), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2363831

Zainudin, Z., & Ubabuddin, U. (2023). Ranah kognitif, afektif dan psikomotorik sebagai objek evaluasi hasil belajar peserta didik. ILJ: Islamic Learning Journal, 1(3), 915–931. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.11169

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Khodijah, Safitri, E. R. ., & Maharani, R. T. . (2026). Conceptualizing Learning Evaluation in Elementary Education: An Integrative Review of Evaluation Objects, Evaluators, and Functions. Passikola: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar &Amp; Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.46870/passikola.v3i1.1909